Jezebel from an African-American Perspective by Stacy Davis

Jezebel, the prototypical evil queen of the Bible, has often been used as a racist stereotype against African American women.

Who is Jezebel?

The biblical Jezebel was from Sidon, in present-day Lebanon, and worshiped Baal (1Kgs 16:31). Her husband King Ahab of Israel followed her lead, earning both of them the wrath of the prophet Elijah. Jezebel threatened to kill Elijah, who then ran for his life (1Kgs 19:1-3). It is Jezebel who inspired Ahab to murder Naboth in order to use his vineyard for a vegetable garden in 1Kgs 21, earning her this prophecy and narrative commentary: “The dogs shall eat Jezebel within the bounds of Jezreel.… Indeed, there was no one like Ahab, who sold himself to do what was evil in the sight of the Lord, urged on by his wife Jezebel” (1Kgs 21:23, 1Kgs 21:25). Years later, King Jehu, with the assistance of a few eunuchs, had Jezebel thrown out of a window and killed (2Kgs 9:32-33).

What do these stories have to do with black women?

In 2Kgs 9:30, Jezebel is said to have “painted her eyes and adorned her head” before being thrown to her death. She made herself physically attractive and enticing, and she had already demonstrated her ability to entice men by leading Ahab into idolatry. That combination of beauty and alleged ability to manipulate men earned Jezebel the label of “whore,” not because of her sexual behavior but because of a common biblical metaphor that portrayed the worship of other gods as sexual unfaithfulness.

However, the sexualized image her name invokes has been used against African American women since at least the eighteenth century. White slaveowners regularly justified their sexual abuse of enslaved women by insisting that black women were jezebels, that is, naturally more promiscuous and tempting than white women. This insistence was linked to differences in shape between white women and black women, particularly regarding breasts and buttocks. In the nineteenth century, Sara Baartman, a black woman from South Africa, was regularly displayed throughout Europe as proof of black women’s animal-like sexuality because of her large buttocks; called “Hottentot Venus” as a way to highlight her race and her body, her sexual organs remained on display in a Paris museum until the 1970s.

After emancipation, black women were still presumed to be sexually available to white men because of their innate inability to control their sexuality. Even young girls were subject to this stereotype, as postcards from the United States in the early twentieth century show young black girls with prominent buttocks, short skirts, and exposed shoulders. One has a girl sucking on a banana in imitation of a sex act. The postcards do not use the term Jezebel, instead showing stereotypical images of black girls’ promiscuity.

Precisely because black women were often denied the luxury of being treated as “ladies,” a title reserved for white women, the Jezebel stereotype reinforced what is now called the politics of respectability in African-American communities. Jezebel’s “idolatry,” or worship of her native deity, made her a dangerous woman, worthy of being killed. Black women, on the other hand, were seen as unworthy of respect in society because of their natural skin color, so they had to look and act their absolute best in public in the hopes of avoiding humiliation, assault, or worse. This led to community policing of a girl’s clothing, hair, speech, mannerisms, and sexual activity. Today, movements such as the natural hair movement and sex positivity are ways for African-American women to resist the Jezebel stereotype that has labeled them as whores. However, the term itself has not died, resurfacing as late as 2021, with some white Southern Baptist ministers calling Vice President Kamala Harris a “Jezebel.” The Jezebel stereotype remains a reminder of the ways a dominant culture can use a biblical image as a justification for racism and sexism.

Stacy Davis, "Jezebel from an African-American Perspective", n.p. [cited 3 Dec 2022]. Online: https://www.bibleodyssey.org:443/en/passages/related-articles/jezebel-from-an-african-american-perspective

Contributors

Davis-Stacy

Stacy Davis
Professor and Chair of Religious Studies and Theology, Saint Mary’s College

Stacy Davis is Professor and Chair of Religious Studies and Theology at Saint Mary’s College, Notre Dame, IN. She is the author of This Strange Story: Jewish and Christian Interpretation of the Curse of Canaan from Antiquity to 1865 (University Press of America, 2008) and an associate editor of The Africana Bible: Reading Israel’s Scriptures from Africa and the African Diaspora.

The supreme male divinity of Mesopotamia and Canaan.

Worship of a diety or cultural value not associated with the one, true, God.

A written, spoken, or recorded story.

An inspired message related by a prophet; also, the process whereby a prophet relates inspired messages to others.

1Kgs 19:1-3

Elijah Flees from Jezebel
1Ahab told Jezebel all that Elijah had done, and how he had killed all the prophets with the sword.2Then Jezebel sent a messenger to E ... View more

1Kgs 21

Naboth's Vineyard
1Later the following events took place: Naboth the Jezreelite had a vineyard in Jezreel, beside the palace of King Ahab of Samaria.2And Ahab s ... View more

1Kgs 21:23

23Also concerning Jezebel the Lord said, ‘The dogs shall eat Jezebel within the bounds of Jezreel.’

1Kgs 21:25

25(Indeed, there was no one like Ahab, who sold himself to do what was evil in the sight of the Lord, urged on by his wife Jezebel.

2Kgs 9:32-33

32 He looked up to the window and said, “Who is on my side? Who?” Two or three eunuchs looked out at him. 33 He said, “Throw her down.” So they threw her down; ... View more

2Kgs 9:30

Jezebel's Violent Death
30When Jehu came to Jezreel, Jezebel heard of it; she painted her eyes, and adorned her head, and looked out of the window.

 NEH Logo
Bible Odyssey has been made possible in part by the National Endowment for the Humanities: Exploring the human endeavor
Any views, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this website, do not necessarily represent those of the National Endowment for the Humanities.